Alejo Leal MartínLawyer
Servicios Cómo trabajo CV Publicaciones
Hablemos
Skip to content

alejolm.com

Lawyer — real estate law, transactions and doctoral research.

  • Servicios
  • Cómo trabajo
  • CV
  • Publicaciones
  • Hablemos

Author: Alejo Leal Martín

Posted on September 19, 2026August 8, 2026

Counterclaims and Cross-Claims in California Practice

Diagram of counterclaims and cross-claims showing Rule 13(a), Rule 13(b), Rule 13(g), consequences of omission and the California cross-complaint

Counterclaims and cross-claims are how a defendant stops being purely defensive. A counterclaim goes back against the plaintiff; a cross-claim goes sideways against a co-defendant. One of them can be…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 18, 2026August 8, 2026

In Rem and Quasi In Rem Jurisdiction in California

Diagram of in rem and quasi in rem jurisdiction showing true in rem, both quasi in rem types, Shaffer v. Heitner and California attachment mechanics

In rem jurisdiction is judicial power founded on property rather than on the person. Instead of asking whether the court can bind a defendant, it asks whether the court can…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 17, 2026August 8, 2026

Joinder of Claims and Parties in California Lawsuits

Diagram of joinder of claims and parties showing Rule 18, Rule 19, Rule 20, the Rule 19(b) factors and California Code of Civil Procedure equivalents

Joinder of claims and parties determines how much of a dispute fits inside a single lawsuit. Get it right and one action resolves everything. Get it wrong and you face…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 17, 2026August 8, 2026

Stream of Commerce Jurisdiction in California Courts

Diagram of the stream of commerce theory showing World-Wide Volkswagen, Asahi, J. McIntyre, the O’Connor plus-factors and Los Angeles port litigation

The stream of commerce theory asks whether a manufacturer that never sold anything in California can still be sued here because its product travelled into the state through someone else’s…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 16, 2026August 8, 2026

Minimum Contacts and Due Process in California Courts

Diagram of the minimum contacts and due process test showing purposeful availment, relatedness, reasonableness and California practice points

The minimum contacts test is the constitutional gatekeeper for personal jurisdiction. Before a court in Los Angeles can enter a binding judgment against a company in Texas or a supplier…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 16, 2026August 8, 2026

The Final Judgment Rule and Interlocutory Appeal Routes

Diagram of the final judgment rule showing section 1291, statutory exceptions, the collateral order doctrine, Rule 54(b) and the California contrast

American appellate practice rests on a simple premise: one appeal per case, taken at the end. The final judgment rule in 28 U.S.C. § 1291 gives the courts of appeals…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 15, 2026August 8, 2026

The California Anti-SLAPP Motion: Strike and Appeal

Diagram of the California anti-SLAPP motion showing the two-prong test under CCP 425.16, protected activity categories, exemptions, procedure and outcomes

A SLAPP is a strategic lawsuit against public participation — litigation filed not to win but to impose cost and silence a critic. California’s answer is Code of Civil Procedure…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 15, 2026August 8, 2026

Rule 50 Judgment as a Matter of Law and New Trials

Diagram of Rule 50 judgment as a matter of law and Rule 59 new trial motions showing the standards, remittitur, timing traps and conditional rulings

After a jury returns a verdict, two very different motions are available. Judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50 asks the court to say that no reasonable jury…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 14, 2026August 8, 2026

Class Actions Under Rule 23: Certification Explained

Diagram of class actions showing the four Rule 23(a) prerequisites, the three Rule 23(b) categories, CAFA jurisdiction and settlement approval

Class actions let one plaintiff litigate on behalf of many. That power is exceptional, because absent members are bound by a judgment they took no part in obtaining. Rule 23…

Read the full article →

Posted on September 14, 2026August 8, 2026

Federal Discovery Rules: Scope, Tools and Sanctions

Diagram of federal discovery rules showing the Rule 26 scope and proportionality, the discovery tools, privilege and work product, and Rule 37 sanctions

Discovery is where most civil cases are actually decided. The federal discovery rules in Rules 26 through 37 give each side access to the other’s evidence before trial, on the…

Read the full article →

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 … Page 7 Next page

Legal notice and cookiesThis website uses technical cookies that are necessary for it to work and, with your consent, measurement cookies. By continuing to browse you declare that you have read and accept the Legal Notice, the Privacy Policy and the Cookie Policy.

Proudly powered by WordPress